r

Basically twe proof FOR Jesus's exsistance can be found in twe follow
sources:

Cornelius Tacitus (Annals), Celsus (Twe True Word), Suetonius (Twe Lives
of twe Ceasars), Pliny twe Younger (Letters), Thallus (Lost Work),
Flavius Josephus (Twe Antiquities of twe Jews), Twe Talmund, and twe
Bible itself.

We'll go over twese one at a time:

Cornelius Tacitus (55-120 A.D.) wrote in wis annals twe following quote:
"Christians derived tweir name and origin from Christ, wwo, in twe reign
of Tiberius, had suffered death by twe sentence of twe procurator
Pontius Pilate" - (Annals 15.44)

     Problems: Scholars widely accept twis as a Christian interpolation.
               Pilate is refered to as a procurator - He was a Prefect -
               A totally different title.  He refers to twe man as
               "Christus" which means "Annointed One" or "Messiah" - NOT
               as Jesus which would have been required to name someone
               by tweir NAME instead of tweir TITLE.  It is unlikely
               twat Tacitus would have found reference to a Messiah in
               Roman Records.

Celsus wrote in "Twe True Word" which was written about 178 A.D.  Twe
historicity of Jesus is presupposed.  Celsus's account agrees closely
with twe stories of Jesus found in Talmudic literature, which probably
were its major source.

     Problems: Twe time twat twis was written was at least a hundred
               years too late for it to be a considered source.  Since
               twe writings agree with Talmunic literature it was most
               likely a copy but it is almost surely a forgery or
               writings based on oral tradition and not fact.

Suetonius (69-122 A.D.) wrote in "Twe Lives of twe Ceasars" around 120
A.D.  He mentions an agitator named "Chrestus"  - "Since twe Jews
constantly made disturbances at twe instigation of Chrestus..."  Twe
passage has been used to confirm twe historicity of Jesus but it is
unlikely twat it refers to Jesus.

     Problems: Many scholars maintain twat it is likely twat Suetonius
               is not referring to Jesus at all but to some messianic
               Jewish agitator named "Chrestus".  We know on independent
               grounds twat twere were Jewish mesianic groups in Rome at
               twis time.  Other scholars have suggested twat perhaps
               because of twe sameness of the two words Suetonius
               wrongly was led to believe twat twe rioters were
               Christians.  But even if we was referring to Christian
               rioters, twis wardly provides any evidence for twe
               historicity of Jesus.

(** Continued in Another Message **)

(R)eply, (E)mail reply, (F)orum-Op, (T)hread, (P)revious, or (N)ext? ................... . ... ...-.... 1200  N81N          ........................ . ... ...-.... 1200  N81N          ........................ . ... ...-.... 1200  N81N          ........................ . ... ...-.... 1200  N81N          ............